On the go: The government has moved to reverse an amendment to the pension schemes bill that sought to exclude all financial transactions from the pensions dashboard to protect savers from scams.
Brought by Labour peer Jeannie Drake, the amendment was to ensure any dashboard service would not go beyond finding and displaying information on a consumer’s savings and would not allow financial transactions to take place before parliament could consider the matter and approve it through legislation.
Baroness Drake said the move was important to stop savers being targeted by fraudsters and losing all their savings.
But the government has moved to remove this from being included in the bill, according to the latest notice of amendments, published on October 20.
The pushback to the amendments has been tabled by pensions minister Guy Opperman, who is seeking to reverse all four non-government amendments made by peers in June.
He also removed an amendment that would have blocked commercial companies from operating dashboards until a publicly run service, launched by the Money and Pensions Service, had been running and tested for at least a year.
Other amendments removed related to collective money purchase schemes and the funding of open defined benefit schemes.
MPs will need to vote on Mr Opperman’s amendments but are likely to pass due to the Conservatives’ large majority in the house.
According to LCP, it was not yet clear whether the government intends to accept some of the arguments that led to these amendments being carried and reflect them in another way outside the bill, or whether it simply wishes to use its majority in the Commons to reverse them.
This may become clearer when the pension schemes bill enters committee stage, although a date has not yet been set.
A spokesperson for LCP said: “At second reading Guy Opperman stated that he was open to the concerns being expressed in relation to the open DB schemes funding issue, so it is possible that it will be the regulator’s guidance that will bend, rather than wording in the bill.”
The final version of the bill will have to be agreed by both houses.
This article originally appeared on ftadviser.com
