Defined Contribution

News analysis: Consultants have urged employers auto-enrolling this year to ensure they are dedicating enough resources to the process, with the Pensions Regulator raising concerns about non-compliance.

The regulator this week encouraged small and medium-sized employers to check when they were required to auto-enrol after awareness and understanding research indicated 47 per cent did not know when they needed to act.

Case study: Now Pensions 

Now Pensions said it had seen "quite a few" cases of clients coming to it having already passed their staging dates and is still receiving calls from employers who were due to stage in the last quarter of 2013.

CEO Morten Nilsson said this number goes into double figures and the provider expects cases of non-compliance to further rise across the board as smaller employers stage.

Nilsson said the postponement period has added to the confusion for many employers. "Some employers will think postponement means they don't have to do anything for three months," he said.

He added: "We would like to see more from the regulator and DWP on communicating to employers their duties."

Nilsson said "we have an escalation process" for flagging up cases of non-compliance among its clients to the regulator, but added that Now issues several warnings to those employers before it reaches this point.

Information released this month by the regulator under the Freedom of Information Act indicated there were 134 breaches of auto-enrolment duties between October 1 2012 and January 31 2014.

This resulted in 129 instances of informal action being taken including instructions via telephone, email, in person and warning letters. The regulator has also taken formal action which includes issuing four compliance notices and one unpaid contribution notice, but no fines have been issued.

Charles Counsell, executive director of auto-enrolment at the regulator, said the watchdog has focused on creating a “pro-compliance culture” where employers have the information they need to auto-enrol staff.

“We are also working with employers to rectify anything that has gone wrong,” he said. “We have only needed to use our statutory powers six times, but we are not complacent and realise that the greatest challenge remains ahead with small and micro employers.”

Challenge of SME compliance 

Many expect the instances of non-compliance with auto-enrolment to rise with the smaller employers reaching their staging dates.

“The biggest challenge is that we have a lot of new employers coming up. It’s been notable that even the big companies have come unstuck in knowing what they need to do,” said Steve Herbert, head of benefits strategy at Jelf Employee Benefits.

Herbert said the complexity of auto-enrolment may be a stumbling block for employers, especially smaller ones with fewer resources.

“The detailed guidance notes are something like 230 pages; it’s a lot of information to take in and they’ll struggle,” said Herbert.

The complexity of implementing the reform can lead to companies focusing disproportionately on their staging date and not to what comes after.

“All companies focus on the staging date... I always tell people to think about what the process should look like and work back towards the staging date from that,” said Mark Pemberthy, executive director at JLT Employee Benefits.

AE employer breaches of duties

The majority of schemes who are not complying are most likely to have committed the breach accidentally, said consultants.

“I have not seen any who are [flouting] the rules, it’s more been in terms of people underestimating the size of the task,” said Timothy Phillips, head of employer duties at Capita Employee Benefits.

Pemberthy said that the financial health of the employer is one of several issues that could play a role in compliance.

“The regulator called out issues around non-payment of contributions. That’s not an AE issue, it may be down to [the]economic issues of employers,” said Pemberthy.

“I would expect some of it to be down to not leaving enough time, not having strong enough control of processes and not enough focus on business-as-usual processes,” he said.

Case study 

Now Pensions

The mastertrust said it is still receiving calls from employers who were due to stage in the last quarter of 2013 and had “quite a few” cases of clients coming to it having already passed their staging dates.

CEO Morten Nilsson said this number goes into double figures and the provider expects cases of non-compliance to further rise across the board as smaller employers stage.

Nilsson said the postponement period has added to the confusion for many employers. “Some employers will think postponement means they don’t have to do anything for three months,” he said.

He added: “We would like to see more from the regulator and DWP on communicating to employers their duties.”

Nilsson said “we have an escalation process” for flagging up cases of non-compliance among its clients to the regulator, but added that Now issues several warnings to those employers before it reaches this point.

Additional reporting by Maxine Kelly